In which the middle-aged Peacenik mouths off about War Drones--and all the other things that make him cranky.

Mr Mahatma--who is a Mr in real life--lives in the valleys of Southern California with his wife, a herd of Dears, and an impressive collection of books. Pnorny!
He is reachable at:
littlemrmahatma@yahoo.com

All writings are copyrighted 2003-2008 and trademarked: Little Mr. Mahatma

tBlog Mirror

Some fun links:
Little Miss Attila - polar opposite and origin of LMM.

Critical Sites:
Dr. Forbush Thinks
Slashdot
Games Slashdot
UserFriendly
James Randi
Snopes
Home of the Underdogs
The Sun Online

For those generous in spirit, heart, and wallet:

Atom RSS Feed

Listed on BlogShares

Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Blogarama-Review My Site

IceRocket

LS Blogs

Blog Universe

Search For Blogs, Submit Blogs, The Ultimate Blog Directory

Blog Directory & Search engine




























 
Archives
<< current













 




























Little Mr Mahatma
 
Tuesday, June 27, 2006  
Flag Desecration
Finally some sanity in the Government, though just barely enough... Don't worry. I'm not posting the entire article. I had to end it on a certain quote.

Senate rejects flag desecration amendment

By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - A constitutional amendment to ban flag desecration died in a
Senate cliffhanger Tuesday, a single vote short of the support needed to send
it to the states for ratification and four months before voters elect a new
Congress.

The 66-34 tally in favor of the amendment was one less than the two-thirds
required. The House surpassed that threshold last year, 286-130.

President Bush, who supports the amendment, called the failed vote
unfortunate and commended Republicans and Democrats who voted to move
the ratification process forward. In a statement, Bush said he continued to
believe that "the American people deserve the opportunity to express their
views on this important issue."

The proposed amendment, sponsored by Sen. Orrin Hatch (news, bio, voting
record), R-Utah, read: "The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical
desecration of the flag of the United States."

It represented Congress' response to Supreme Court rulings in 1989 and 1990
that burning and other desecrations of the flag are protected as free speech
by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

Senate supporters said the flag amounts to a national monument in cloth that
represents freedom and the sacrifice of American troops.

"Countless men and women have died defending that flag," said Majority
Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., closing two days of debate. "It is but a small humble
act for us to defend it."

So, Mr. Frist, if I'm travelling in South Dakota or some other forsaken place and I see someone desecrating the flag, can I kill them and claim defense? It's a flag, fer Pete's sake! A piece of cloth. It has no more inherent worth or value than a bible. If people like you are willing to kill someone over a piece of cloth or a book, then pity you. Countless mena and women have died because some politicians are stupid and self-serving. Should we dedicate libraries in their names?


Our Government needs to focus on important things like where the money is disappearing to in Iraq and why our President believes himself above the Law. Accountability is a much bigger issue than this time and money wasting Flag Amendment.


8:13 PM

0 comment(s)


 
Site 
Meter     This page is powered by Blogger.