In which the middle-aged Peacenik mouths off about War Drones--and all the other things that make him cranky.

Mr Mahatma--who is a Mr in real life--lives in the valleys of Southern California with his wife, a herd of Dears, and an impressive collection of books. Pnorny!
He is reachable at:
littlemrmahatma@yahoo.com

All writings are copyrighted 2003-2008 and trademarked: Little Mr. Mahatma

tBlog Mirror

Some fun links:
Little Miss Attila - polar opposite and origin of LMM.

Critical Sites:
Dr. Forbush Thinks
Slashdot
Games Slashdot
UserFriendly
James Randi
Snopes
Home of the Underdogs
The Sun Online

For those generous in spirit, heart, and wallet:

Atom RSS Feed

Listed on BlogShares

Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Blogarama-Review My Site

IceRocket

LS Blogs

Blog Universe

Search For Blogs, Submit Blogs, The Ultimate Blog Directory

Blog Directory & Search engine




























 
Archives
<< current













 




























Little Mr Mahatma
 
Wednesday, October 06, 2004  
Vice Presidential Debate
Whereas the first Presidential debate between Kerry and Bush was an obvious and easy victory for Kerry, this debate proved more difficult to call. In summary, I felt that Cheney helped Bush more than Edwards helped Kerry but remember that Bush had a deeper hole to climb out of. A few things of note. Cheney is one smooth mother even when lying but his demeanor bordered on pompous. He never once admitted fault at any time for any reason. Twice Edwards countered assertions by Cheney to which the Vice President countered back with only "it's in the record" or "the record speaks for itself" which left the impression that Cheney was, in fact, in the wrong.


Edwards appeared too nervous, drinking water often, and - fer pete's sake - keep that lizard tongue tucked away. He had some good comebacks but I felt he never really cracked Cheney, never got to him the way Kerry addled Bush. A mistake of Edwards was repeating the same things over, literally. And in the beginning of the debate where he restated something by Kerry almost word-for-word was a complete turnoff. If it was meant to show that he was on the same page as Kerry it didn't work. It didn't show that he had a mind of his own.


Most important is when you consider the pairs Bush/Cheney and Kerry/Edwards. With Kerry/Edwards it's obvious in comparing these two that Kerry is the Presidential candidate by his demeanor and attitude. Edwards is still a little too raw to run for the top job. (During the debate Edwards was challenged as to the qualities he had for the job, in particular, if he had to take over as President. Cheney claimed that Edwards had far less experience than he. Edwards should have countered that Bush had less experience than all of them but he didn't say that point - pity.)


When you look at the Bush/Cheney pair, you'd likely guess that Cheney was the President. He had the poise, the speaking ability, the knowledge. After the debate I had the feeling that Bush really was nothing more than a talking head, a puppet being used by Cheney and Co.. Worse, hearing that Bush never had wanted to run and had to be talked into running only confirms that suspicion. Finally, watching Cheney was like watching The Godfather or the Sopranos. Cheney is someone you don't want to cross. Don't expect Cheney (or Bush) to ever admit wrongdoing.


Vote for Kerry.


7:42 AM

0 comment(s)


 
Site 
Meter     This page is powered by Blogger.