Bush Wins; Kerry Loses II
Some folks misunderstood my intent of the previous post by this name. When I commented that no matter what the outcome of the elections, that Bush wins and Kerry loses, it's not a win in the good sense (unless you're Bush or one of his cronies). A Bush win is bad for us (America, The World...) - not something to gloat about. Bush is not leading us down a path to paradise and happiness for all. It'll be war 24/7 - somewhere - to keep showing America as strong and unyielding, and to keep the war profits a-rolling.

North Korean Nukes
North Korea proclaimed it has nuclear capabilities for "defensive purposes". In this new Bushian Age of preemptive strikes do we strike them first or do they strike us first? Either side now has a legitimate right (according to U.S. policy) for its actions, thanks to Bush and the Iraqi Invasion. In fact, as the number one nuclear, biological, and chemical warfare power in the world, we should be the natural target for preemptive strikes since to maintain our status as number one we have to strike first. Logical, right? Do you feel safer now?

Hmmm, that sounds like a commercial. Picture a guy in a radiation suit wandering around the world and talking into his phone "Are we safer now?"